Compare in-memory query engines
Results show query (and data load) performance statistics of various query engines. Filters update the summary charts and detailed comparison below.
Benchmark filters
| Solution: | All |
|---|---|
| Additional filters | Open source: Yes No Sort columns: Time Sym, Time Hardware: CPU GPU |
| Threads: | Metric: Cold Run Hot Run Second Hot Run |
| Machine: | Size: Data date: |
| Baseline: | |
| Query Filters | |
| Instrument filter: | |
| Complexity filter: | |
| Include tags: | |
| Exclude tags: | |
Benchmark summary
| Solution |
Geometric mean[1] of per-query time ratios relative to (lower is better). |
|
|---|---|---|
Query Failures
number of null execution times (☠)
number of null execution times (☠)
Wins per solution
on how many of the compared queries the solution posts the fastest time
on how many of the compared queries the solution posts the fastest time
Max Res Mem (GB)
maximum resident set size of the benchmark process (reported by
maximum resident set size of the benchmark process (reported by
time -v)
Data Size (GB)
in-memory size of the loaded tables (reported by the engine)
in-memory size of the loaded tables (reported by the engine)
No results match the selected filters. Select a solution above or use Reset filters.
Detailed Comparison
Load Times
[1] A failed query is counted in the geometric mean with a penalty ratio: twice the worst time ratio posted for that query by any of the compared solutions.