Results show query (and data load) performance statistics of KDB-X (q-sql) running the same benchmark on different machines. Data resides in memory, so query execution in this benchmark primarily tests memory and CPU performance. Hover over a machine to see the hardware it stands for. Filters update the summary charts and detailed comparison below.
Benchmark filters
| Machine: | All |
|---|---|
| Baseline: | |
| Threads: | Metric: Cold Run Hot Run Second Hot Run |
| NUMA node: | |
| Data: | Size: Data date: |
| Query Filters | |
| Instrument filter: | |
| Complexity filter: | |
| Include tags: | |
| Exclude tags: | |
Benchmark summary
| Machine |
Geometric mean of per-query time ratios relative to (lower is better). |
|
|---|---|---|
Wins per machine
on how many of the compared queries the machine posts the fastest time
on how many of the compared queries the machine posts the fastest time
No results match the selected filters. Select a machine above or use Reset filters.
Detailed Comparison
Load Times[1]
[1] The "load a partition into memory:" phase duration depends primarily on disk speed, not CPU/memory performance. It can be ignored when comparing machines in this in-memory benchmark.